Monday, April 28, 2014

Where are we losing America’s future primary care physicians?





Article of Interest

 

4/28/2014
 

ARTICLE DETAIL:


Author:                       Michael Bradfield
Article Date:               April 22, 2014
Title:                           Where are we losing America’s future primary care physicians? 

Source:                        KevinMD.com

                                    http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/04/losing-americas-future-primary-care-physicians.html
 

  
Where are we losing America’s future primary care physicians?


I know where America’s future primary care physicians are, and more importantly, where we are losing them. I am one of them, and I almost got lost.

Maybe I was naïve. I’d had no math or science classes as an undergraduate, and I’d never really thought about the mechanics of medical education. Even while jumping through all the prerequisite hoops before applying, it never occurred to me how inadequate my non-traditional background was for sitting still long enough to memorize what seemed like every enzyme in the human body. Fueled more by the art of medicine than the science of it, I told myself I was ready, that I was to be a doctor, and the process could not deter me.

So began two years of sitting in a windowless dungeon of an auditorium watching PhD after PhD lecture on the various “basic sciences of medicine.” It was a collision of what I perceived to be two very different types of creatures: I seemed to have absolutely nothing in common with the quite intelligent, distinguished individuals charged with preparing me to become a physician. For starters, most of those individuals did not want to be physicians. Even the few MDs sprinkled into the curriculum seemed to spend more time with microscopes and cadavers than with patients. Neither ambition is wrong or less noble. They are just completely different. So I adapted, each day moving closer to equating medicine with basic science, memorizing as much as possible and trying to survive and trust the process.

Somewhere in those days in the dungeon, the skills that I had originally thought would make me a competent physician — compassion, observation, critical thinking, communication — were replaced by ideals like competition, memorization, and a realization that medical school rewards those who can regurgitate the most details for the next exam. Even now in my clinical years, those who put the most time into doing question banks and memorizing review books are rewarded on standardized shelf exams over those who would prefer to spend a little extra time in a hospital learning the bedside art of being a physician.

 Each year, the more I focused on memorizing and building the endurance for four-hour examinations, the less I focused on cultivating skills like critical thinking, reason, logic or the use of the scientific method. There is one correct bubble for each disease, no discussion. No time to think or reason. Much smarter people have already done that for me. Slowly, the art of medicine was swallowed by science and by an educational system that has failed to change over the last one hundred years as administrator after administrator has misinterpreted the Flexner report, which reads, “Scientific inquiry and discovery, not past traditions and practices, should point the way to the future in both medicine and medical education.”

 
How can we expect and hope to change the demographics of the physicians produced or the problems inherent in our health care system when we’ve followed the same process for over 100 years? Why would physicians today think any differently than they did 20 years ago if we are still selecting and training them in the same way?

 
I am not naïve to the importance of research nor the importance of each branch of medicine. I appreciate the advances in science and medicine over the last 100 years. I merely write to tell you that I was drawn to medicine because I know there are competent artists still among us. I met some of those individuals — many of them rural family docs practicing in Tennessee where I’m now in school — before I decided to apply to med school. Some of them — some of you — not only know the mechanism of each pathology you discover in a patient, but you also have the tact, skill, and compassion to explain it to a rural patient with a third-grade reading level and select an adequate medication that the patient can afford. Those physicians are out there. The problem is, you aren’t in here, in medical schools, where all the future primary care physicians are.
 

The future of primary care is in that dungeon, waiting for one of you to come walking through that door. The future of primary care is here with me, stuck in a 100-year-old process that doesn’t allow us a moment to hone the skills that make a truly competent primary care physician. The skill set we acquire doesn’t lend itself to a primary care career where answers are not black and white or as simple as filling in the right bubble on an exam.  But we have to survive, so we develop the skills that are presented to us, and in the “process,” many of us fall off the path to primary care, feeling uncomfortable in a profession that requires a skill set that we do not get to cultivate in medical school.
 

Don’t assume there is someone at each school casting the net to encourage primary care during the basic science years, even at “primary-care friendly” institutions like mine. Admissions standards are not changing, LCME requirements are not changing, and I don’t think medical school leaders have the gumption or grace to deviate from the model enforced by the more prestigious institutions.

 
Take responsibility. Come find us. Recruit one student and you’ve replaced yourself, recruit two and you are part of the solution. We need primary care doctors, not academics, to infiltrate our system and show us what you do. Force your way into my curriculum. Show me that primary care is a viable choice. Future primary care physicians are out there. Please come find us.

 

 

Like Us on Facebook:           https://www.facebook.com/Accuchecker 

Follow US on Twitter:          https://twitter.com/HPPAccuchecker

 
Join our Group:                    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1467439953488495/

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Accountable Care & Care Coordination




Accountable Care
& Care Coordination

 
A foundation for improved population health

As a proposed pillar of community health merging ambulatory primary care with multi-specialty, hospital, rehabilitation and other healthcare entities and needs, accountable care organizations (ACOs) will be linked through innovative electronic health record (EHR) and related health IT platforms to achieve seamless and comprehensive medicine.

Major accountable care goals
·         Harness growing healthcare costs annually approaching $3 trillion

·         Advance EHR-driven preventive medicine, care coordination and wellness focusing on each patient’s care continuum under a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) concept

·         The ability to collect and analyze clinical, claims and payer data to enable quality monitoring and reporting

·         Promote remote monitoring/telehealth to advance the communication of care plans to patients

 What’s an ACO?

An accountable care organization is comprised of a group of healthcare providers who work collaboratively to deliver coordinated care and chronic disease management, improving the quality of care patients receive.
A participating organization’s payment is tied to achieving healthcare quality goals and outcomes that result in cost savings. Medicare ACOs were formed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), with Medicaid and commercial accountable care organizations following suit.


 How is an ACO Formed? 

 Medicare ACOs  

 To form a Medicare ACO and participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), participants must agree to the following:
 
o Agree to be accountable for the care of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries

o Agree to three-year participation in the ACO program

o Create a formal legal structure that allows the organization to receive and distribute bonuses to participating providers

o Include at least 5,000 beneficiaries

o Create and institute a specific management structure

o Promote evidence-based medicine, report on quality and cost measures, and coordinate care

o Demonstrate that the ACO meets patient-centered criteria
 

 A Medicare ACO must have a governing body, such as a board of directors or managers who are responsible for:
 
o The operational and strategic aspects of the organization, which includes holding management accountable for meeting the goals of the ACO

o The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that ACOs must have a transparent governance process and board members who have fiduciary duties to the stakeholders
 

 Must evaluate inventory, resources, human capital, data systems, leadership, and clinical organization  

 Key component of ACO formulation and execution is coordinated care that relies on health information technology for informational tracking

 
 Eligible Medicare ACOs must follow the instructions in the Notice of Intent (NOI) to Apply Memo and submit the application and accompanying required documents

 
 Questions about the Medicare program can be directed to the local CMS regional office
 

Commercial ACOs
 

 Commercial ACOs vary in structure from a Medicare ACO in the following ways
 

o Payers, hospitals, and physician groups can form coalitions under a contract to provide coordinated care management where payment is determined by metric sets, possible expanded from those of a Medicare ACO

o Payers provide the financial incentives to the provider organization allowing flexibility among various Commercial ACOs 

 

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is an inventive program that focuses on improving primary care. The recognition program is outlined by a clear set of standards, empowering providers with information needed to personalize care to their patients and enabling providers to work in teams to better coordinate care.
ACO and PCMH programs share quality measures both in structure and approach, and also align with those of the meaningful use program.

 

Like Us on Facebook:           https://www.facebook.com/Accuchecker 

Follow US on Twitter:          https://twitter.com/HPPAccuchecker 

Join our Group:                    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1467439953488495/

 

Article of Interest - Investing for value-based care 04/22/2014





Article of Interest

April 22, 2014

 

ARTICLE DETAIL:

Author:                                    Diana Manos, Contributing Editor
Article Date:                          April 22, 2014
Title:                                       Investing for value-based care

 

Source:                       This story is based on a report appearing on Government Health IT.

                                    HEALTHCARE FINANCE NEWS

                                    http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/investing-value-based-care

 
Found this article to be of interest. As we prepare to move away from Fee-For-Service reimbursement as we know it; various models are being to developed to meet the delivery of Healthcare.
 

Investing for value-based care 

To quickly make the transition from fee-for-service to value-based care, accountable care organizations must figure out where to invest and take cues from those which have mastered the model. 

This is an era of “heavy-duty strategies and tough decisions,” said J.D. Whitlock, director of clinical and business intelligence at Catholic Health Partners, during a presentation at the Healthcare Business Intelligence Forum hosted by HIMSS Media and Healthcare IT News on April 16. (Healthcare Finance News is a division of HIMSS Media.) 

To be successful in the current scenario hinges on the ability of hundreds of ACOs to learn quickly from the organizations that have mastered ACOs –  organizations like Geisinger Health System, the Mayo Clinic and Kaiser Permanente. 

Organizations like this have invested heavily in electronic health system technology. ACOs that are trying to make the transition to value-based care need to figure out where to invest their technology dollars, Whitlock said. 

Core options are investing in deploying – and subsidizing for affiliates – a centralized EHR capable of at least some population health management or deploying a private HIE capable of clinically integrating many disparate EHRs and a comprehensive population health management platform. “You probably aren’t going to be able to afford both,” he noted. 

ACOs also need to invest in their analytics team, said Whitlock, which should include a healthy mix of junior and senior analysts and those with claims data and clinic expertise. Ideally, it’s best to get clinical and claims analytical capability in the same person, but that’s hard to find, so organizations might need to grow that dual capability in individuals over time. 

 

AccuChecker

Since 1983 we have been helping physicians to operate practices as businesses over 500 Medicare and Medicaid audits have given us the knowledge to develop the AccuChecker Product Line including Claims Scrubbers and for the 10 years we have been involved in Risk Management and have developed the MCAR Reports – Managed Care Reports. 

For More Details:

CONSULTING SERVICES

Please contact us at (305) 227-2383


 


Like Us on Facebook:           https://www.facebook.com/Accuchecker
 

Follow US on Twitter:          https://twitter.com/HPPAccuchecker
 

Join our Group:                    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1467439953488495/

Monday, April 21, 2014

Article of Interest - Coding for Both a Preventive Service and Problem-oriented Visit




Article of Interest

April 21, 2014
 

ARTICLE DETAIL:

Author :             Betsy Nicoletti
Article Date:  4/16/2014

Title:               Coding for Both a Preventive Service and Problem-oriented  

Source:          Physician Practice [ physicianpractice.com ]

 
 

We have been asked this question many of times. I came across this article and found it to be interest. However, it does answer the question correctly. The key issue is VERIFICATION. Your office should check with the carriers for further clarification. LCD or NMP the article displays the correct method.

 
What doctor hasn't heard this before: "While I'm here, I'd like to discuss a few problems."
 
The patient presents for an annual preventive medicine service and arrives in the exam room with a long list of concerns, questions, and complaints; some pre-existing and some new. The clinician wants to discuss screening tests, healthy behaviors, and risk factor reductions, but the patient has another agenda. So what do you do?

 There are three possible solutions, none of them perfect for this situation: provide two services for the price of one; ask the patient to schedule another appointment; or bill for both. Each of these is coded differently and each has financial and patient satisfaction implications.

The CPT book states:

 "If an abnormality/ies is encountered or a preexisting problem is addressed in the process of performing this preventive medicine evaluation and management service, and if the problem/abnormality is significant enough to require additional work to perform the key components of a problem-oriented E&M service, then the appropriate office/outpatient code 99201-99215 should also be reported."

The May 2002 CPT Assistant newsletter provides additional detail and clinical vignettes on this topic. Its examples include treating both new and established problems, and recommend reporting both the preventive medicine service (99381-99397) and a problem-oriented visit. The problem-oriented visit is reported with the diagnosis for the condition that is treated, and the preventive medicine service is reported with a diagnosis code for an examination. Append modifier -25 to the problem-oriented visit.

A preventive medicine service is an age and gender appropriate history and exam and includes anticipatory guidance, a discussion about risk factor reduction, and provision or referral for immunizations and screening tests. The history recorded, the exam performed, and the content of advice will vary by the age and gender of the patient.

A problem-oriented visit is one that addresses an acute or chronic condition and documents history, exam, and medical decision making related to the condition.

1. Two for the price of one
Some clinicians report only a preventive medicine service, even when addressing multiple acute or chronic issues. Why? Medical practices report that many payers won't reimburse for the second service and that patients, expecting a free preventive service, are angry when there is a copay or the charge goes to the deductible. It is true: Collecting from insurance companies is difficult, most state Medicaid programs will only pay for one E&M on a calendar date, and patients are angry when they get a bill for a service they thought was free, yet has a cost. But, is this reason enough to provide two services for the price of one? "I'll have the hamburger and the fish and chips, but only charge me for the hamburger."

2. Set up another appointment
For a patient in a medical crisis, the clinician will reschedule the preventive service. But, this is also an option for a patient with multiple problems to address. Tell the patient there isn't time to do his annual exam and address his list of seven problems. Perform one that day and re-schedule the others. If the clinician does the physical, ask the patient to identify his most pressing concern and treat it.

3. Perform and bill for both
If both services are done, follow the CPT rules and report both the preventive service and the problem-oriented visit. The patient will be charged a copay for the problem-oriented visit, or may be charged full fee for that visit, depending on her insurance coverage. Be prepared for complaints, and be sure the documentation is complete.

Some coders recommend two notes, one for the preventive service and one for the problem-oriented visit. This isn't very practical in EHR. But, if reporting both, take care in documenting the part of the visit that supports the non-preventive portion of the visit. In the history of the present illness, describe the patient's symptoms or her chronic conditions. Don't conserve words. "HTN-stable; DM-okay; Lipids-will check," will hardly justify the addition of a problem-oriented visit.

Also, if the entire HPI is copied from a previous visit, don't report an additional visit. In the HPI, document pertinent positive and negative systems related to the presenting problem. In the assessment and plan, list the conditions treated and changes to the treatment. You should be more likely to report a problem-oriented visit when there is a new acute condition, a worsening chronic condition, a diagnostic test was ordered, or a treatment was changed. Refilling prescriptions for existing problems is not sufficient work to report a problem-oriented visit, in addition to the preventive service.

Clinicians in the same practice group may have different philosophies and practices regarding this issue. It is useful to discuss these with the billing and coding staff and to develop a written policy. Consistency in implementing the policy helps both clinicians and staff answer patient questions.
 
Follow US on Twitter:            https://twitter.com/HPPAccuchecker 

Like US on Facebook:             https://www.facebook.com/Accuchecker 

Join our Group on Facebook:  

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Article of Interest 04/16/2014




Article of Interest

April 16, 2014

 

ARTICLE DETAIL:

Ask if new technology will make a difference in patient outcomes





Earlier this year, I completed a medical rotation in Africa. It was an amazing, eye-opening experience. While I expected it might be difficult to acquire newer, more expensive medications and procedures, I had anticipated that, given limited resources, there would be some rationale in deciding which medications and procedures would be available. I was deeply mistaken in this assumption.

During my time abroad, I watched several patients with heart attacks pass away because there was no thrombolytic (clot-busting) therapy. Thrombolytic medications are inexpensive and have been around for more than 50 years. The low cost of these medications combined with the high rates of coronary heart disease makes it puzzling that the hospital did not have thrombolytic medications.

Instead, the hospital was building a cardiac catheterization lab. While catheterization can produce better patient outcomes than thrombolytic therapy for heart attacks, it is significantly more expensive and good outcomes require skilled interventionists with experience performing a high volume of catheterizations. In a country with few trained cardiologists (not to mention interventional cardiologists), this latter resource is essentially unobtainable.

This was just one example of many puzzling choices that I saw during my time abroad. Others include the presence of CT and MRI machines as well as ventilators but an inability to acquire basic labs including serum bicarbonate levels, arterial blood gas levels or reliable culture results. To me, it seems that, in a country with high rates of communicable diseases, reliable culture results are more important for patient outcomes than an MRI.

While the leaders of the institution had chosen to invest in the most modern technologies instead of finding the greatest value for their funds,  I want to make clear that this decision is not unique to those in developing countries. In fact, we in the United States do this all the time as well.

We often fail to ask if the new, fancy technology will make the biggest difference in patient outcomes. Has increasing the use electronic medical records improved care coordination or quality of care? Is a 10 Tesla MRI machine meaningfully different from a 3 or 5 Tesla machine?

Sometimes it is the simple, low-cost changes that make the greatest difference in patient outcomes. Antimicrobial foam outside every patient room. Rotating ICU patients every two hours. Removing unnecessary central lines.

We are a rich country, but we do not have unlimited resources. We also need to seek the greatest value for our money. We need high-value health care.

The idea of high-value health care has been around for several years but has gained increasing traction as our country begins to recognize that even we have finite resources. The New England Journal of Medicine and Harvard Business Review recently collaborated to create an online forum to help health care leaders identify ways to increase the value of health care.

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement has long been a proponent of value. Its website contains several resources for identifying ways to achieve high-value health care. Of particular interest is its 5 Million Lives Campaign that focused on specific actions that would prevent 5 million incidents of medical harm in hospitals over a two-year period.

As future health care providers in the current health care climate, we will be asked not only to practice evidence-based medicine but also high-value medicine. It is important that we know what actions provide the most value in ensuring patient safety and improving patient outcomes. Now is as good a time as any to start learning.

Elaine Khoong is a medical student. This article originally appeared in The American Resident Project.

 

Follow US on Twitter:            https://twitter.com/HPPAccuchecker 

Like US on Facebook:             https://www.facebook.com/Accuchecker


Join our Group on Facebook:   


 

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Article of Interest - Why the future of health care can be found in the Cayman Islands




Article of Interest

 

 

Article Detail

 

Author:                     
Title:                           Why the future of health care can be found in the Cayman Islands
Source:                       KevinMD.com

                                    http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/04/future-health-care-cayman-islands.html

 



The Cayman Islands are nestled in the Caribbean Sea some 430 miles south of Miami. The three-island cluster is known for its inviting coral-sand beaches, laid-back island culture and tax-free status.

While it lures many tourists and big banks, it’s not the first place you’d expect to find the future of American health care. That may change soon.

Last month, I flew to the Caymans to moderate an afternoon-long panel on delivering high quality, affordable health care. Earlier in the day, more than 2,000 attendees from around the world gathered under a large tent to celebrate the opening of a new 104-bed hospital.

Why all the fuss? Because this new facility is the work of Narayana Health chairman and India’s most renowned heart surgeon, Dr. Devi Shetty.

As featured in the Wall Street Journal and the widely cited Harvard Business School case study, Narayana is internationally regarded as a low-cost, high-quality health care provider. Its newest hospital, Health City Cayman Islands, is the organization’s first development outside of India.

It has American health care providers watching closely and anxiously.

Narayana Health positioned to deliver quality care to Americans

At the end of 2013, Narayana Health was operating 18 hospitals across 14 cities in India. With a laser focus on efficiency and quality, the average Narayana cardiac hospital performs 40 heart surgeries a day for less than$1,600 a case.

That’s about 2 percent of the average heart surgery cost in the U.S. with outcomes that rival the best American facilities.

With the first phase of the Cayman Island hospital completed in February, Dr. Shetty plans to expand Health City Cayman Islands to 2,000 beds over the next decade. And both his vision and strategy extend well beyond this Caribbean destination.

In the United States, there is about 1 hospital bed per 333 people. The Grand Cayman Island has about 50,000 residents. When Dr. Shetty completes his expansion plans, his newest hospital will feature 1 bed per 25 Grand Cayman residents. It doesn’t take a heart surgeon to see Dr. Shetty is thinking way beyond the Caymans.

Given the hospital’s close proximity to Miami, Dr. Shetty must be planning to attract patients from the United States. That would certainly explain the 5-star hotel he built next door with a foot bridge connecting the two world-class structures.

Today, Health City Cayman Islands focuses on cardiac and total joint surgery. It will add cancer care and transplant services in the near future. Plans are already underway to construct an international medical school and a variety of high-quality residency training programs. He expects this facility to become a global academic medical center and a destination for the best medical school graduates.

Some American health systems may scoff at the idea that Americans will travel to Health City. But if Dr. Shetty can match the performance of his hospitals in India, his vision is likely to be a reality sooner than they imagine. Already, the Cayman Island’s business-friendly government has allowed Dr. Shetty to move ahead with development much more rapidly than he ever could in the U.S.

Dr. Shetty’s strategy: Charge less, treat more  

In this new Cayman Islands facility, Dr. Shetty will charge less than half the average U.S. price for surgical procedures with quality outcomes that are likely to match or exceed the very best U.S. hospitals.

His approach to cost cutting is not based on paying lower wages. The Cayman Islands enjoy a similar standard of living and wage structure as the U.S. And he won’t be purchasing inferior supplies or medical implants. Nor will he use shabby construction or outdated technologies.

In fact, his approach is just the opposite.

Dr. Shetty buys only the best heart valves and orthopedic implants. He invests heavily in state-of-the-art medical and information technologies. And his construction team tested the new hospital’s windows for hurricane conditions by battering them with two-by-fours, launched at over 100 miles per hour.

How then could he possibly reach this level of cost and quality? His approach builds on his personal passion for quality, a fervor for operational excellence and a commitment to technology.

The power of purpose and vision

As Dr. Shetty addressed the audience of 2,000+ during the dedication ceremony, his passion radiated.

He began by reiterating that human life should not be determined by a price.

“One hundred years after the first heart procedure was performed, only 10 percent of the world can afford to have one,” he said. “We can and must do better. The future cannot be just an extension of the past. It must embrace new technology, implement innovative approaches and aim higher than people thought possible before.”

For those who doubted it can be done outside the U.S., Dr. Shetty pointed out that “the greatest leaps forward happen when a nation goes from nothing to the modern age.”

As an example, he pointed to India’s recent communications boom. In less than a decade, the nation went from limited telephone access to 850 million mobile phones. Without an existing landline infrastructure, India could bypass the time and cost of installing fixed phones in every home.

The same is true for hospitals. A facility that offers very few advanced procedures today can quickly leapfrog world-leading hospitals because – instead of slowly replacing old technologies – they can immediately implement sophisticated, modern technologies and cherry-pick the most innovative operational designs.

“[Health care] affordability will not come from the United States or any of the current world leaders, but rather from those nations of the world that have little today and have no choice but to perform at the highest levels possible in the future,” he said.

Dr. Shetty understands that institutions must be economically viable. But he is also a mission-driven leader. On that warm day in February, he concluded his remarks by reminding attendees, “The day we turn anyone away from this place of healing for an inability to pay is the day we have failed as an institution and betrayed God’s commandment.”

How Dr. Shetty achieves high quality at lower costs

So, what’s his secret? Dr. Shetty and Narayana Health incorporate a four-part blend of sophisticated technology and economies of scale to deliver exceptional quality while managing costs:

1. Utilizing real-time data

Patient care at Health City Cayman Islands is supported by state-of-the-art technology that uses a robust electronic medical record (EMR) system to augment clinical care.

Every patient admitted to the hospital receives a low-cost mobile tablet that’s manufactured in India. The device contains each patient’s medical information collected throughout his or her stay.

Doctors and nurses access the encrypted information through Google Glass devices and Bluetooth-enabled watches as they make their rounds. These devices allow patients to communicate with doctors and nurses from anywhere in the hospital while also staying connected with their loved ones far away.

When the patient leaves the hospital premises, all medical information is immediately erased from the tablet and stored on hospital servers.

A central care area with four large wall-mounted computer screens allows physicians to continually monitor patients. Three of the screens offer video monitoring of individual patients along with their comprehensive medical data. The fourth screen shows real-time performance metrics across the medical center, paying particular attention to medical care delays.

2. Eliminating medical care delays

According to Dr. Shetty, time is the enemy of quality and cost savings.

“When patients have potentially life-threatening problems such as a low blood-oxygen level, diminished blood pressure or an untreated infection, their health deteriorates with every passing minute,” he said.

Doctors can minimize this deterioration by responding rapidly when unexpected clinical findings surface. This allows the patient to recover much faster and reduces the total cost of care.

You might think every hospital would do this, but that isn’t the case.

To heighten the hospital’s focus on rapid response, the EMR system Dr. Shetty built contains a list of lab results and clinical findings that predict potentially significant medical problems. Whenever a patient’s lab tests fall out of an acceptable range or a nurse records an abnormal finding, the computer system launches an internal clock, which records the speed of response. Once treatment begins, the system documents the time it takes for physicians and nurses to respond appropriately.

The hospital-wide average time for an appropriate response in one of Dr. Shetty’s hospitals is seven minutes. He hopes to cut that time in half. In the typical U.S. hospital, this time delay is not measured. A best guess would yield 30 minutes during the day and as long as an hour at night.

As Dr. Shetty explained, “These delays mean prolonged hospital stays, increased medical complications and even death.”

3. Leveraging global time zones

Dr. Shetty recognizes that time of day can predict the quality of care in a hospital.

“Hospitals are most dangerous after midnight, since that is when the least experienced nurses work and there are the fewest number of physicians available,” he said.

His goal: To provide excellent care around the clock.

To accomplish that, he staffs the central-care monitoring area with experienced physicians who closely monitor patients – not just those in the Cayman Islands, but patients and medical information half way around the world.

When it’s daytime in the Cayman Islands, it’s nighttime in India. Therefore, during the day, the Health City Cayman Islands doctors help monitor video feeds of post-operative patients in India and quickly alert their colleagues at the slightest sign of a problem. At nighttime in the Caymans, physicians in India return the favor.

4. Taking advantage of scale

The higher the volume of patients in a hospital and the more experienced the surgeons, the better the care. When the volumes rise even more, physicians can sub-specialize in particular operations, further improving quality outcomes.

But the advantages of higher volumes are more than just higher quality. Higher volumes lower the capital investment needed per patient and reduce supply costs. Higher volumes help smooth out the daily variation in demand, allowing for optimal staffing levels. And high volumes allow hospitals to expand their use of their facilities into the evening and on weekends so teams of physicians and nurses are more readily available, further decreasing the time to treatment.

To achieve “scale” – that is, to enjoy the benefits of increased volume – Dr. Shetty is focused on maximizing the productivity of his staff and utilization of his facilities.

And to blaze the path, he sent his most experienced surgeons and nurses from India to Health City. They understand what is needed to run the operating rooms and cardiac catheterization areas 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, and deliver high- quality, efficient care starting from day one.

The result is productivity double that of the typical U.S. hospital.

What does this mean for U.S. health care?  

At the end of Dr. Shetty’s ceremony, I asked him why others before him had not adopted the same approaches.

“The future is in front of them, but they can’t see it,” he said.

Based on everything I saw in the Cayman Islands that day, the operational approaches in Dr. Shetty’s hospital are about 10 years ahead of those used in the typical U.S. hospital.

It may take a decade for him to complete his 2,000 bed construction and attract the volume of patients necessary to fill each bed. But if I were the CEO of a hospital in Florida, I would be rushing to match his outstanding clinical outcomes and low prices today. Once Health City Cayman Islands is fully operational and filled to capacity, it will be too late.