OIG warns on the use of the copy-paste function in
EHRs
Medical Documentation Alert
- Risk adjustment
- Problems with incomplete documentation
- Medical necessity: Reasonable and necessary services
- E/M medical necessity
- OIG and Joint Commission's take on copy and paste
- Templates for ages and gender
- New and established patient documentation
- Examples of MDM and diagnosís
Although
electronic health records are here to improve the quality in documentation ,
providers have to take steps to avoid
potential fraud. Providers are responsible for the input, vendors do NOT take
responsibility or liability.
Vendors
promote coding based on the diagnosis or
data input for a patient encounter and
that could be a fatal mistake for
the provider. The provider is responsible
for determining the level of service , medical necessity, and the quality of
care. Furthermore, providers have been warned
on the cloning of medical record from one patient to the next.
The HHS Office of Inspector General has issued a
report on the degree to which users of electronic health records have policies
addressing the use of the copy-paste function in EHRs and have implemented
fraud safeguards. The copy-paste function in EHRs poses a substantial risk of
fraud, according to OIG. Only 24% of providers or facilities that receive EHR
meaningful use incentive payments had policies in place regarding use of copy-paste,
and only 44% of providers/facilities
audit logs recorded the method of data entry, which would flag copy-paste. The
risk arises because providers may not update the copied information to ensure
accuracy, and the function could be used to inflate claims and duplicate or
create fraudulent claims. OIG recommended that CMS work with the Office of the
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and the medical
community to develop guidelines for using the copy-paste feature in EHR
technology and consider whether the risks of some copy-paste practices outweigh
their benefits. OIG recommended that CMS and ONC continue their collaborative
efforts to develop a comprehensive plan to address fraud vulnerabilities in
EHRs.
Ø Does your
documentation pass a Medicare or Medicaid Audit ?
Ø Correct use of Level
of Service billed?
Ø Are you UPCODING or
DOWN CODING?
Ø Are the quality
measures defined in the medical documentation ?
Providers
are urged to implement procedures to audit the documentation in the medical
record. Implement safeguards for level of service billed and/or review the encounter to determine medical
necessity.
For more details , contact:
SILBEN Healthcare Services, INC.
Paul G. Silverio-Benet
Phone: 305-975-1171
Email: sbhealthcaremgmnt@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment